17 Reasons Why You Shouldn't Beware Of Asbestos Lawsuit History
Texas Asbestos Lawsuit History
Many companies have been bankrupt because of the asbestos lawsuits filed by the victims. An asbestos lawyer can assist you in obtaining compensation.
Experts in the health field have warned for decades about the dangers asbestos exposure. However, the industry's leaders hid the dangers. As time went on, asbestos-related diseases became more prevalent.
The Third Case
Asbestos litigation began to take off in the 1970s, shortly after research studies began to link asbestos with serious illnesses such as mesothelioma or asbestosis. Because these diseases often don't manifest until years after exposure, tens of thousands of lawsuits were filed. Many of these claims were brought in Texas where favorable laws made it an ideal venue for this litigation inferno.
One of the most significant cases that shaped asbestos litigation was Johns Manville, the leading producer of asbestos products in the 1940s and 1950s. In the 1980s, it was brought to light that the company's CEO Lewis Brown prioritized company profits over the health of his employees. Deposition testimony revealed that Brown was heavily influenced the company's chief medical advisor Dr. Russell Budd. Budd was an expert in his field who was known for his indifference to the health of employees.
Bloomington asbestos lawsuit showed that Johns Manville knew about the asbestos dangers but took no action to safeguard its workers. The court decided that the company was responsible for damages to workers who later developed mesothelioma and other asbestos-related illnesses. The court also ruled that the company was responsible for damages for the families of employees who passed away.
After the decision in Borel, many asbestos victims and their families sought compensation from the companies that made use of asbestos. Unfortunately, the majority of claims were dismissed for a variety of reasons. Certain cases were allowed be heard, and the courts developed guidelines for the handling of asbestos-related lawsuits.
In the 1990s, asbestos defendants still sought legal rulings to limit their liability. They wanted to argue that asbestos materials were not a component of their product and therefore they should not be held liable for injuries caused by people who worked with it. These claims were unsuccessful and the U.S. Supreme Court refused to accept the "asbestos product" defense.
Today, a mesothelioma patient's right to seek compensation from the responsible parties in a case is protected under federal and state law. However insurance companies continue defend these claims with a hammer and a sledgehammer.